Disney simply modified a single phrase in its Incapacity Entry Service coverage that may very well be consequential for DAS approvals & denials going ahead. This covers the earlier than and after of language change, plus our commentary in regards to the motivations (or lack thereof) for making this tweak and the way it may find yourself being minor however significant in observe.
As fast background, Disney overhauled DAS at Walt Disney World and Disneyland previous to the beginning of final summer season. In response to the corporate, the adjustments had been due largely to abuse, misuse, and proliferation of this system’s use–with issuances of DAS tripling from 2019 to final yr. For extra in regards to the specifics of the new-look Incapacity Entry Service, plus our commentary about winners & losers, in addition to collateral injury and extra, see Incapacity Entry Service (DAS) Adjustments at Walt Disney World FAQ.
We’ve been following this saga intently for the final a number of months, receiving studies from readers and studying accounts of different visitors making use of for lodging after the overhaul of the Incapacity Entry Service at Walt Disney World. Clearly, it’s a extremely delicate topic that may be very, very private since it’s, fairly actually, make or break for some visitors making an attempt to expertise Walt Disney World. There have been widespread studies of visitors who beforehand had DAS being denied and suggested to make use of different lodging, a few of that are new–or are revised and highlighted extra prominently.
Suffice to say, it’s been a contentious ~9 months between the corporate and the disabled neighborhood. Many followers have hoped that Walt Disney World and Disneyland would chill out the coverage or overhaul it as soon as once more, and there’s been a grassroots marketing campaign to perform precisely that.
Quick ahead to late January 2025, and the DAS coverage has been up to date in a number of areas on each the Walt Disney World and Disneyland official web sites. Right here’s who Walt Disney World now signifies DAS is aimed to help:
Outdated language: “DAS is meant to accommodate solely these Visitors who, because of a developmental incapacity like autism or related, are unable to attend in a standard queue for an prolonged time frame.” (Emphasis added.)
New language: “DAS is meant to accommodate these Visitors who, because of a developmental incapacity like autism or related, are unable to attend in a standard queue for an prolonged time frame.”
It’s value noting that that is basically Disney’s assertion of intent for DAS, as variations of this language seem on the very high and all through Walt Disney World’s official DAS web page. It’s not one thing minor buried in an FAQ or one thing inconsequential.
Turning to commentary, it might look like solely one little phrase, however there’s undoubtedly a cause being made for the change. This isn’t simply somebody on Walt Disney World’s internet workforce swiftly making adjustments, like we’ve seen numerous occasions within the final yr which have resulted in errors for the attraction lineups at arduous ticket occasions, refurbishments, and so forth.
Each phrase written on the DAS supplies could be scrutinized by Disney Authorized. They’d have the ultimate say, and approve or dictate any verbiage adjustments or loosening of limiting language. The flip facet of that’s that Disney’s attorneys would’ve achieved exactly the identical previous to launching the DAS overhaul. A military of attorneys in all probability spent months poring over each phrase on these web sites previous to publication–particularly the assertion of intent for the new-look DAS.
In different phrases, that “solely” was accepted by Disney Authorized and its elimination is likewise being accepted by Disney Authorized. However in all probability not from the angle of issues about authorized publicity, as these conservations would have already occurred, extensively. Disney Authorized undoubtedly carried out complete litigation threat assessments, which is exactly why they elected in opposition to utilizing IBCCES and steered the overhaul in a distinct path, even when many disabled visitors would’ve most popular that. (Common has since stopped requiring IBCCES, seemingly on account of ongoing litigation in regards to the service at Six Flags.)
The overhaul to DAS will virtually definitely give rise to extra litigation, regardless. Accessibility adjustments inevitably do, and it’s seemingly Disney’s perspective that it’s the price of doing enterprise. The die is forged, no matter this “solely.” (I’d additionally count on Disney to prevail in any such lawsuit, as Disney Authorized is meticulous and methodical.)
I’m very reluctant to play armchair lawyer on this as I’ve zero related experience and Disney Authorized has numerous attorneys who do. Second-guessing them appears barely foolish. With that stated, the factor that shocked me from the outset was Disney utilizing limiting language tailoring DAS to visitors with developmental disabilities.
Parsing the language, it’s not simply the “solely” that issues there–it’s additionally the “because of.” The coverage shouldn’t be utilizing developmental disabilities for instance, it’s narrowing the scope of the lodging to developmental disabilities and offering autism for instance. Eradicating “solely” may change perceptions, nevertheless it doesn’t change the coverage.
For this to be a fabric change from a authorized perspective, I’d suppose the phrase that will should be stricken is “developmental.” By limiting the lodging to solely visitors with developmental disabilities, it’s potential Disney is pre-screening out a category of disabled people which may run afoul of the ADA. In that case, that’s nonetheless true with an easy studying of the assertion of intent, since “solely” merely reinforces the “because of” (identical to earlier iterations included “small proportion” of visitors language).
However once more, I’d think about Disney Authorized did their due diligence on this and decided that, when it got here to authorized publicity, different lodging to DAS had been adequate for all different lessons of disabled visitors. Taking part in armchair lawyer right here is silly.
Given all of that, it’s however protected to imagine this verbiage change is deliberate, however shouldn’t be being made out of the angle of publicity to litigation. It’s additionally protected to imagine this isn’t taking place haphazardly and got here after cautious consideration and evaluation. So what may be the rationale for Disney making this alteration ~9 months after launch?
My finest guess is that Disney needs to melt the perceived limitations within the coverage amongst potential candidates. To make it seem much less harsh or stringent, to encourage visitors aside from these with developmental disabilities to use for DAS. It may very well be a manner of unofficially increasing the scope of eligibility with out making any substantive adjustments to the coverage or overhauling this system but once more.
This may need occurred if the Encourage Well being Alliance well being professionals and Disney Forged Members who work collectively to find out applicable lodging have additionally seen inner insurance policies loosened. That might imply both giving them better discretion in approving DAS purposes, or informally increasing eligibility standards for DAS with out extra materials guest-facing language adjustments.
Past that, it’s troublesome to say why this alteration may need occurred. And it’s not possible to know the way it’ll play out in observe till there are extra studies of DAS approvals and denials. Even then, what’s reported isn’t essentially consultant of this system as a complete, as there’s self-selection bias in who’s most probably and least prone to share their experiences. “We’ll by no means know what this implies in observe” isn’t precisely a satisfying evaluation, nevertheless it’s in all probability correct.
Disney is in an unenviable place right here with great quantities of push-pull.
On the one hand, there have been heartbreaking tales of DAS denials, lots of which have gone viral for good cause. These have made it actually look like a extra versatile and humane strategy providing better discretion to Forged Members is important. All of this strongly recommended that Disney went too far with the DAS overhaul, and wanted some extent of enjoyable its insurance policies.
Then again, Disney must keep away from enjoyable its guidelines an excessive amount of, or else threat a return to the rampant abuse that was fostered by vastly in style TikToks and influential social media teams. This has been exacerbated by a way of entitlement, lack of disgrace, and Disney creating an incentive for DAS scammers by monetizing line-skipping through Lightning Lanes.
It’s a very powerful for Disney to steadiness this, however as we’ve stated repeatedly, there must be a center floor. The pendulum swung from one excessive to a different, and there was plenty of collateral injury amongst disabled visitors who wanted DAS and have been denied beneath the overly-stringent system.
Then there’s additionally the influence on the visitor expertise for everybody else, which is faster-moving strains and decrease wait occasions. We mentioned this at size in Right here’s Why Standby Strains and Lightning Lanes Are Shifting Quicker at Walt Disney World. The underside line is that the DAS adjustments and, to a lesser extent, change from Genie+ to Lightning Lane Multi-Cross are having a major influence. It ought to go with out saying that there are controversies, downsides, and unlucky realities to the above. However the enchancment to the circulation of strains–standby and Lightning Lanes–in addition to decrease wait occasions can be simple.
Ultimately, there’s rather a lot for Walt Disney World and Disneyland to steadiness, and I wouldn’t need to be on the workforce tasked with that. It’s a very powerful and delicate needle to string. Right here’s hoping this single-word change to the DAS eligibility standards on each coasts is precisely what’s wanted to realize that unicorn of lowered abuse, approvals for individuals who really want DAS, and contours that proceed to circulation easily for everybody.
Planning a Walt Disney World journey? Find out about accommodations on our Walt Disney World Accommodations Critiques web page. For the place to eat, learn our Walt Disney World Restaurant Critiques. To economize on tickets or decide which kind to purchase, learn our Suggestions for Saving Cash on Walt Disney World Tickets submit. Our What to Pack for Disney Journeys submit takes a singular have a look at intelligent gadgets to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Trip Guides will assist. For complete recommendation, the perfect place to begin is our Walt Disney World Journey Planning Information for every little thing you’ll want to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
Ideas on the slight language change to DAS insurance policies at Walt Disney World and Disneyland? Assume that is prompted by authorized publicity, Disney desirous to informally broaden DAS eligibility, or one thing else? Hopeful that this may end in elevated approvals for individuals who really want DAS whereas protecting abuse low? Agree or disagree with our evaluation of the adjustments or coverage as a complete? Please attempt to keep on subject–we’ve seen a few of these DAS feedback sections get heated and private. Talk about the coverage itself, not others’ use (or lack thereof) of it.
